I agree with you in that the struggle to define it as a theory is distracting, I consider it a model that time will validate even if it is so focused in the present. What matters to me is to see if it really works and provides a sound way to ensure learning.

I cannot pinpoint exactly why but the idea of minimizing the value of the “pipe” does not resonate with me. I want to see how do they sort out the assessment or evaluation issue which I consider critical.

I see that Connectivism places a lot of weight on the Internet because is is being promoted as a Learning Theory for the Digital Era. Digital and Internet go hand on hand but even if they see that the whole world is already on that Digital Era I have doubts about that point. As far as I can see Mexico is not there yet.

I like the way you include the past here, I believe we are what we are due to our past. Denying it will only lead to trouble in the long run.

I admire the way you placed your sources, thanks for sharing your views.
See you around. Love: Maru

Thank you, your paper is very interesting. I like your historical perspective of the topic and I agree with the idea that “it is a contemporary learning theory that seems dependent on particular conceptions of knowledge and a perspective focused on contemporary computer-based internet technology”. And I like very much also your criticism when you say “a world of “networked individualism”, is (is not necessarily) a good thing”.

Kind regards
Carlos

Interesting post and nice job on the paper. I liked your reference to Cognitive Connectivism and believe that this is where I’m leaning as well. Thanks also for including the link to Ken Anderson’s comments about it. I haven’t had the time to devote the amount of effort to the course that I should have so far, so maybe I’m missing something, but every time I dive into it I come away with the thought that most of the ideas fit easily into the field of cognitive science. The course is stimulating and I’m learning a great deal, but I really am having trouble seeing how it is new or a separate learning theory.

I’m also trying to sort out networked individualism which seems kind of narcissistic to me, especially the idea about people no longer having strong family ties, but just temporarily hooking up with people for a while before moving on to something new. I can’t quite see how that’s an improvement for us in the long run. Maybe it’s where some societies seem to be headed at the moment, but is it something to be celebrated?

As a history undergrad, I also enjoyed your thoughts on how networks to the past fit into Connectivism. I need to spend more time on this.